Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65112: regressions
- FAIL"):
> On 27.11.15 at 13:28, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> --- a/README.email
> >> +++ b/README.email
> >> @@ -71,6 +71,24 @@ history. Here are some examples:
> >> detect regressions of this test. Perhaps the test has been
> >> recently introduced.
> >>
> >> + fail in 58948 REGR. vs. 63449
>
> It seems confusing to me that the numbers are reversed from how
> I think they would normally appear (regressions normally being
> against older flights).
You mean the example would be less confusing with a different number ?
I'll change it.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
