>>> On 25.11.15 at 17:26, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 09:16 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> The use of $(basename ...) here was wrong (yet I'm sure I tested it). > > Is the issue here that xen/arch/x86/x86_64/.compat.o.d ought really to be > xen/arch/x86/.x86_64.compat.o.d?
No, xen/arch/x86/x86_64/.compat.o.d is the correct name. Just that $(dir $(1)).$(basename $(notdir $(1))).d produces xen/arch/x86/x86_64/.compat.d (i.e. strips the .o, which is not in line with $(@D)/.$(@F).d used to generate those files), and hence neither dependency tracking nor cleaning work. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
