On 11/16/15 12:22, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Huh, so what's wrong with a jump:
>
> jmp 1f
> swapgs
> 1:
>
What is the point of that jump?
>> If it would make you feel better, it could be X86_BUG_XENPV :-p
>
> That doesn't matter - I just don't want to open the flood gates on
> pseudo feature bits.
>
> hpa, what do you think?
Pseudo feature bits are fine, we already have plenty of them. They make
sense as they let us reuse a lot of infrastructure.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
