On 13/11/15 17:41, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 13.11.15 at 17:26, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >> On 13/11/15 15:44, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> setup_IO_APIC_irqs() runs before APs get brought up, so using >>> desc->arch.cpu_mask as best risks it being either empty or having bits >>> for CPUs other than the BP set. Just use the APIC ID of the only >>> online CPU directly. Replace a stray hard_smp_processor_id() at once. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> Surely this stray hard_smp_processor_id() needs to be merged into your >> previous patch to remove hard_smp_processor_id() ? > Actually I should have said that the other one depends on this one. > Which one to put that hunk in really doesn't matter much.
It would be cleaner to deal with all hard_smp_processor_id() together, as the other hunk is this patch is a far more clear candidate for backport. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
