>>> On 04.11.15 at 17:50, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen/public: arm: rework the macro
> set_xen_guest_handle_raw"):
>> All quite interesting, but pretty moot with there not being any
>> get_xen_guest_handle() anymore.
>
> If we don't provide a get_xen_guest_handle, a kernel developer will be
> sorely tempted to make one.
What use would it be to them? Kernels only write handles, they
shouldn't have a need for reading them.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
