>>> On 28.10.15 at 16:44, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 27/10/15 08:05, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 26.10.15 at 19:08, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> However, IIUC, the get_xen_guest_handle is only exposed to the tools and >>> therefore possible to modify it in order to pass the type. Am I wrong? >>> FWIW, I haven't seen any usage in the tools directory. >> >> Indeed. Rather than worrying about getting it right, let's just drop it. >> Patch sent a minute ago. > > On the same note, is there any reason we want to expose > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM to the guest? > > It has been introduced with ARM to represent a guest pointer as an > hypercall pointer and only used within Xen to differentiate 32bit vs > 64bit build.
I don't see a need for it to be exposed, but I'd like the ARM folks who introduced it (Stefano iirc) confirm that. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
