On 27/10/15 12:44, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.10.15 at 13:05, <david.vra...@citrix.com> wrote: >> radix_tree_gang_lookup() only requires a RCU read lock, not the >> per-domain event_lock. > > ... when not caring about a consistent snapshot. > >> @@ -678,9 +684,7 @@ void hvm_dpci_msi_eoi(struct domain *d, int vector) >> if ( !iommu_enabled || !d->arch.hvm_domain.irq.dpci ) >> return; >> >> - spin_lock(&d->event_lock); >> pt_pirq_iterate(d, _hvm_dpci_msi_eoi, (void *)(long)vector); >> - spin_unlock(&d->event_lock); >> } > > How about other callers of pt_pirq_iterate()?
They weren't hot so I didn't look at them. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
