On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:55:39PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 12:29 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > I can send a patch for Config.mk when the patch passed our tests. > > > > For xen-unstable I think we should just move up to > > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest/ovmf.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xen-tested-master > > > > We don't have any separate tests for ovmf in 4.6 (since there is currently > > no correpsonding git branch to even test, I think) so the only way to > > trigger those would be to backport a Config.mk change (again, I think). > > Maybe we should have a separate tree/branch for ovmf 4.6? What if a bug > is found?
In theory we can. But OVMF doesn't make release so this tree / branch would be hard to manage. EDK (UDK?) makes release, but we don't know yet how it's managed, and we don't know whether OVMF developer care about those releases enough to backport their fixes. Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
