> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 4:57 PM > To: Hu, Robert <robert...@intel.com>; 'Ian Jackson' > <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; 'xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org' > <xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org> > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH v14 PART 2 10-26/26] Nested HVM testing > > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 08:04 +0000, Hu, Robert wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Hu, Robert > > > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:36 AM > > > To: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; > > > xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > > > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > > > Subject: RE: [OSSTEST PATCH v14 PART 2 10-26/26] Nested HVM testing > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:15 AM > > > > To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > > > > Cc: Hu, Robert <robert...@intel.com>; Ian Campbell > > > > <ian.campb...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > > > > Subject: [OSSTEST PATCH v14 PART 2 10-26/26] Nested HVM testing > > > > > > > > This is the second part of v14 Robert Ho's osstest patch series to > > > > support nested HVM tests. > > > > > > > > It is also available here: > > > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/xen.git > > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/iwj/xen.git > > > > in wip.nested-hvm.v14.part1..wip.nested-hvm.v14 > > > > > > > > Compared to Robert's v13, which was passed to me by private email, > > > > * I have rebased onto current osstest pretest; > > > > * I have changed how selecthost() is told it's dealing with > > > > a nested host (in practice, L1 guest); > > > > * There are a large number of minor cleanups; > > > > * There are some new preparatory cleanup and admin patches; > > > > * I have rewritten almost all of the commit messages. > > > > > > > > However, I have done only VERY LIMITED testing. Much of the code > > > > here > > > > is UNTESTED since my changes. My testing was confined to: > > > > * Verifying that my changes to cs-adjust-flight worked > > > > * Checking that ad-hoc runs of ts-host-reboot and > ts-host-powercycle > > > > seemed to work when a guest was specified on the command line. > > > > > > > > Robert, you kindly volunteered to test a revised version of this > > > > series. I would appreciate if you would check that all of this still > > > > works as you expect. I expect there will be some bugs, perhaps even > > > > very silly bugs, introduced by me. > > > Sure. > > > Am I supposed to test Part 1 together with this Part 2? or each > > > individually? > > > How's Part 1's status now? pass pretest and in production branch? or > > > still > > > need test? > > Seems Part 1 already in production tree. So I directly merged Part 2 on > > latest production master branch. > > > > However, when I run 'standalone-reset', I get these errors > > [root@robert-ivt osstest]# ./standalone-reset > > ** need to generate d-i with firmware for armhf > > fetching initrd.gz > > > http://linux-ftp.sh.intel.com/pub/mirrors/debian//dists/wheezy/main/insta > > ller-armhf/current/images/vexpress/netboot/initrd.gz => initrd.gz.new > > collecting firmware-bnx2 > > collecting backports initramfs-tools > > collecting backports kernel > > dpkg-deb: error: `backports.deb' is not a debian format archive > > Can you look at the file backports.deb and see what it is? e.g. > $ file backports.deb > might give a clue. For me it says "Debian binary package (format 2.0)". > > My guess is that it will tern out to be some HTML explaining that this file > is not available via your proxy for some reason. Fixed. By moving out 'armhf' in my arch list. >
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
