>>> On 06.10.15 at 12:26, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > Now arguably any maintainer of a piece of libxl ought to be familiar with > all of that. But, personally I don't think that is very reasonable either > as a burden for those feature maintainers or particularly as a strategy for > ensuring the library remains coherent.
Agreed. But rather than always requiring multiple acks, wouldn't it be more reasonable for the "small" maintainer to explicitly request an ack from the "large" one in such cases? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
