On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 13:21 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > However, I think your point is valid... I think I can, in case > > vnuma_nodes is provided, overrun $ram_mb with something more likely > > to > > fit on one physical node? > > > > Missed this one, sorry. > > I'm not sure what exact thing you proposed. But I think it would be > valuable to have the guest ram larger than 4GB. That would certainly > catch many bugs that involves memory layout changes, especially for > feature like vnuma. > Well, once I'm parsing (see the my other reply), I guess I can easily check whether that it is possible and, if yes, make it happen. Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
