On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 16:30 +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: > Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn't suffice > after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of > type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually > this means we can benefit this to support other specific devices just > by extending gfx_passthru_kind. And then we can cooperate with > gfx_passthru to address IGD cases as follows: > > gfx_passthru = 0 => sets build_info.u.gfx_passthru to false > gfx_passthru = 1 => sets build_info.u.gfx_passthru to true and > build_info.u.gfx_passthru_kind to DEFAULT > gfx_passthru = "igd" => sets build_info.u.gfx_passthru to true > and build_info.u.gfx_passthru_kind to IGD > > Here if gfx_passthru_kind = DEFAULT, we will call > libxl__is_igd_vga_passthru() to check if we're hitting that table to need > to pass that option to qemu. But if gfx_passthru_kind = "igd" we always > force to pass that. > > And "-gfx_passthru" is just introduced to work for qemu-xen-traditional > so we should get this away from libxl__build_device_model_args_new() in > the case of qemu upstream. > > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@intel.com>
Acked + applied both patches, thanks. Stefano -- are the QEMU side patches in qemu-upstream-unstable.git yet? If not I suppose this is a call/reminder to backport them from mainline or whatever. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
