>>> On 25.09.15 at 17:07, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > El 21/09/15 a les 16.48, Boris Ostrovsky ha escrit: >> On 09/21/2015 10:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 04.09.15 at 14:08, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: >>> Hmm - this seems questionable to me: Isn't the vPMU an optional >>> feature anyway? I.e. doesn't need separate handling here? Boris? >> >> It is optional system-wise, not per-guest, which is what I think Roger >> is trying to do. I in fact wanted to add ability to disable VPMU per >> guest myself. >> >> However, VPMU has nothing to do with device model so I don't think it >> should be part of this series from that perspective. > > vpmu is enabled globally on the xen command line, there's no way to > disable it on a per-guest basis, so AFAICS it will be enabled for > HMVlite guests which is wrong because we don't have a vlapic.
Hmm, Boris specifically enabled vPMU to be available to all three kinds of guests, and PVH in it s current shape doesn't have a vLAPIC either. So making such a connection seems wrong to me. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
