On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 06:20 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 24.09.15 at 14:07, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 05:50 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > a specific error type > > > to me seems to go too far. Surely out of the several dozen > > > possibilities a handful of not-so-common ones can be picked? > > > > I was thinking in particular EINVAL was not in the not-so-common > > bracket. > > Which I fully agree with. > > > The current code already uses 9 values FWIW. > > Right, but ENXIO would e.g. seem to be a reasonable fit for > "Unable to set code or data CBM when CDP is disabled".
That would be better yes (sorry I didn't check if this came up in the review of the hypervisor side) Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
