An issue which Xen has is an uncertain support statement for features. Given the success seen with docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown, and in particular keeping it up to date, introduce a similar system for features.
Patch 1 introduces a proposed template (and a makefile tweak to include the new docs/features subdirectory), while patch 2 is a feature document covering the topic of migration. This is tagged RFC as I expect people to have different views as to what is useful to include. I would particilarly appreciate feedback on the template before it starts getting used widely. Lars: Does this look like a reasonable counterpart to your formal support statement document? Jim: Per your request at the summit for new information, is patch 2 suitable? Andrew Cooper (2): docs: Template for feature documents docs: Migration feature document docs/Makefile | 2 +- docs/features/migration.pandoc | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/features/template.pandoc | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 docs/features/migration.pandoc create mode 100644 docs/features/template.pandoc -- 1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
