>>> On 19.08.15 at 20:37, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 19/08/2015 07:05, Jan Beulich wrote: >> ... wouldn't it make more sense to leave the generation of these >> Linux-specific tags to Linux (and allow them to continue to be Linux >> specific), by the same or a second, parallel (Xen) stub? This would >> then also move at least some of the awkward table creation (and >> ideally also copying) to that stub. > > We don't want to use a specific Xen entry path. So having a Xen stub is > has to be rule out. > > Anyway as said multiple time, there is no issue to drop the "linux," in > the properties. They are only used internally between the stub and the > kernel (both are built in the same image). > > It would be pointless to create a stub just for renaming the properties...
Agreed. As long as it's not Xen to create these tags, I guess I'm fine with that particular aspect. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
