On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] gitignore: Don't
> ignore *.rej"):
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:07:37AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > These indicate a patch application went wrong, I want to see them in
> > > "git status". This appears to have been imported from .hgignore where
> > > it has been since 2005.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Kiper <daniel.ki...@oracle.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
>
> (As an aside, I would normally apply a `usual' kind of trivial
> .gitignore update without waiting for any kind of ack. But this one
> seems not entirely trivial.)
Right, I thought it might even be controversial, but it seems not. I've
applied.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
