On 12/08/15 11:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 12.08.15 at 12:00, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> >> On 12/08/2015 08:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> This paragraph should get "on ARM" added somewhere. There is no >>> inherent requirement for such a restriction on another architecture >>> Xen might get ported to; the only restriction of the current interface >>> is that it can't support page sizes from 64k up. On an architecture >>> e.g. not supporting other than 8k pages things would still be fine, >>> yet the comment above would then be wrong. >>> >>> An alternative might be to say "... is always the smallest >>> architecturally supported page size (e.g. 4k on x86 and ARM) >>> irrespective of ...". >> >> While this is true today, I don't see anything that would prevent a new >> architecture to respect this. > > I don't think I get what you're trying to say here.
I meant that it may be possible to have an architecture where Xen would support 64KB page size and the smallest page granularity would be 4KB. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
