On 08/11/2015 05:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.07.15 at 19:54, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 07/23/2015 10:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Plus - is this in line with what the tools are doing? Aren't they
assuming !PV <=> native format context? I.e. don't you need
to treat differently v->domain == current->domain and its
opposite? Roger btw. raised a similar question on IRC earlier
today...
Not sure I understand this. You mean for copying 64-bit guest's info
into 32-bit dom0?
Basically yes - tool stack and guest invocations may need to
behave differently.
This being PVH-"classic" it follows exactly the PV path (both in tools
and the hypervisor). Wouldn't PV be broken then as well?
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
