On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 15:17 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > It is not used, and can cause a spurious failure of the set_gdt() > > hypercall in > > low memory situations. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > > Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com>
It's unclear from MAINTAINERS if this is formally enough for the patch to be applied but under the circumstances (pretty obvious patch, Reviewed-by more than one person, including the X86 MEMORY MANAGEMENT maintainer even if mm.c isn't strictly under that for some reason) I've added my own Revieed-by and applied, hopefully that is ok. Perhaps there should be a patch to MAINTAINERS to add arch/x86/mm.c to the relevant subsection? (Or maybe the file is just horribly named?) Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
