On July 28, 2015 11:51:00 AM EDT, Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >On 27/07/15 20:20, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/compile.h.in >b/xen/include/xen/compile.h.in >> index 440ecb2..939685e 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/xen/compile.h.in >> +++ b/xen/include/xen/compile.h.in >> @@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ >> #define XEN_EXTRAVERSION "@@extraversion@@" >> >> #define XEN_CHANGESET "@@changeset@@" >> +#define XEN_BUILD_ID "@@changeset@@" > >I am not sure putting the changeset into the build id field is >sensible. >
Correct, it is unfinished. >On the other hand, linking .note.gnu.build-id and exposing it as >XENVER_build_id seems like a very sensible thing to do. It would >probably make sense to expose it in `xl info`. That can certainly be done. > >~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
