On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:09 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:58:29PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > So, just to check if I'm understanding is correct: you'd like to add an > > abstraction layer, in Linux, like in generic (or, perhaps, scheduling) > > code, to hide the direct interaction with CPUID. > > Such layer, on baremetal, would just read CPUID while, on PV-ops, it'd > > check with Xen/match vNUMA/whatever... Is this that you are saying? > > > > If yes, I think I like it... > > I don't think this is workable. For example there are applications > which use 'cpuid' and figure out the core/thread and use it for its own > scheduling purposes. > Naah! That pretty much only happens with databases, so, honestly, who cares!! ;-P ;-P ;-P Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
