>>> On 23.07.15 at 16:51, <ravi.sah...@intel.com> wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >>Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 3:06 AM >>>>> On 23.07.15 at 01:01, <edmund.h.wh...@intel.com> wrote: >>> @@ -758,6 +765,38 @@ bool_t p2m_switch_vcpu_altp2m_by_id(struct >>vcpu >>> *v, unsigned int idx); >>> /* Check to see if vcpu should be switched to a different p2m. */ >>> void p2m_altp2m_check(struct vcpu *v, uint16_t idx); >> >>The context here suggests that I overlooked a still not replaced uint16_t. >> > > Ok. > > Just wanted to make sure these are also ok to do post 4.6
I guess so, but you realize you're stretching it? Plus the patch can't go in as is anyway, considering the off-by-one bugs found. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
