Just to your example,
libxl_domain_config cfg;
cfg.stuff = blah;
cfg.rdm.strategy = HOST;
libxl_domain_create_new(&cfg, &domid);
libxl_domain_destroy(domid);
Here looks you mean d_config->rdms would be changed, right? Currently
this shouldn't be allowed. But I think we need to further discussion
make this case clear after feature freeze since we didn't have this kind
of assumption in our previous design.
libxl_domain_create_new(&cfg, &domid);
This response of yours does not lead me to think you have understood
what I am saying, but I agree that this can be dealt with later (if
Indeed, I'm not a fan to Xen tools so I can't picture what this real
scenario would happen. So if I'm misunderstanding what you mean, just
please correct me. Or if you still think its hard to explain this to me,
just tell me what I should do. I think this make your life easy.
Thanks
Tiejun
indeed it needs to be dealt with at all).
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel