>>> On 21.07.15 at 02:53, <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: >> > Okay, I regenerate this patch online. And I just hope its good to be >>> acked here: >> >> Provided it also works, >> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Why is this marked as Acked-by this time? The same question is raised to > another hvmloader patch as well. > > This really makes me confused since you're the key maintainer associated > to this, and I remember you also gave me Acked-by to the first hvmloader > patch. I know this solution is always argued, so does this mean you > still don't think this is good to go in the tree in your perspective, so > you want to leave this Acked-by to other maintainers, right?
Keeping in mind that others (and other projects) may consider this differently, at least on the hypervisor side we've been mostly treating (or trying to treat) Reviewed-by as a superset of Acked-by. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
