On 16/07/15 17:09, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 16/07/2015 16:19, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> Hmmm... right. I'm not sure why the compiler didn't catch it. >> >> Because there is not a path where it can possibly be used >> uninitialised. The for() loop is guaranteed to execute at least once. > > Oh right, the ret = 0 asked by Stefano confused me. In this case, I > don't see the point to initialize ret to 0 as it will never happen to > have the Linux page granularity inferior to the Xen page granularity.
I agree. I would certainly not initialise ret if that was my code. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
