>>> On 16.07.15 at 15:21, <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: > I guess something like this, > > ... > pci_writew(devfn, PCI_COMMAND, ~cmd); > /* Jump next device. */ > goto check_next_device; > } > } > } > } > check_next_device: > } > }
Except that this isn't valid C (no statement following the label). I can accept goto-s for some error handling cases where the alternatives might be considered even more ugly than using goto. But the way this or your original proposal look, I'd rather not have goto-s used like this. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
