Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH] libxl/remus: fix the return value of the
checkpoint callback"):
> Does that mean it won't apply to current staging?
Indeed it doesn't.
> I think we probably want this fix ASAP rather than waiting for that
> series?
Yes. Patch just sent. Untested but fairly obvious. Yang, do you
want to test this, or do you want us to apply it as-is ? I don't have
a remus test setup.
This is the second rc-handling bug in 31c836f4 "libxl: events: Permit
timeouts to signal ao abort". I am going to re-read that patch to see
if I can find any more.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
