On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 15:45 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: > @@ -2921,6 +2911,26 @@ _hidden void > libxl__checkpoint_devices_preresume(libxl__egc *egc, > libxl__checkpoint_devices_state > *cds); > _hidden void libxl__checkpoint_devices_commit(libxl__egc *egc, > libxl__checkpoint_devices_state > *cds); > + > +/*----- Remus related state structure -----*/ > +typedef struct libxl__remus_state libxl__remus_state; > +struct libxl__remus_state { > + /* private */ > + libxl__ev_time checkpoint_timeout; /* used for Remus checkpoint */ > + int interval; /* checkpoint interval */ > + > + /* abstract layer */ > + libxl__checkpoint_devices_state cds;
This mostly makes sense, I think, but this one field feels like it will be wanted by colo too. Does that mean we will end up with dss->rs.cds and dss->colo.cds doing effectively the same thing? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel