On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/9] libxl: fix libxl__abs_path"):
> > On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 11:23 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > If we don't want to support it we can just remove the check and let it
> > > crash.
> >
> > An assert at least gets us a slightly improved message when it happens.
>
> If that logic applies here it applies to almost every function in
> libxl. I don't think this is a sensible approach.
OK.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
