On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 13/07/2015 18:32, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > All these #ifdefs are a bit ugly. Couldn't we just build this code > > always, even on arm32, relying on dt_match_node not to match in that > > case? > > I'm not in favor of any ITS code in the common code unless it's strictly > necessary. > > In this specific case, the number of ITS between DOM0 and the hardware may be > different. Per the design document, we only support 1 virtual ITS. > > Furthermore, on the version 3 of this patch [1], I said that it's possible to > do it in the hwdom_dt_callback and avoid all this mess in a function which > only browse the device tree.
That would be OK by me _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
