On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 18:16 -0700, Meng Xu wrote: > 2015-07-08 1:33 GMT-07:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>: > > Well, wouldn't the above reasoning about overhead apply here too? > > Budgets of 5us mean the scheduler can be invoked every 5us for budget > > enforcement. If 10us was unreasonable, 5 is even more so. > > > > Therefore, 100us here too? Or maybe let's allow for lower values (like > > 50us or 10us), but print a warning? > > Right. we can use 100us as a threadhold for budget too. Maybe printing > warning is a better idea? > If users know what they are doing and expecting, it is ok. But too > small value (<1us) will potentially cause system freeze. > I'd be ok with printing a warning for vales below 100us, and rejecting values below 1us, or even below 10us (I don't think it would be that practical to go below that anyway).
Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
