>>> On 10.07.15 at 07:59, <feng...@intel.com> wrote: > If you agree with doing all this in a central place, maybe we can create > an arch hook for 'struct scheduler' to do this and call it in all the places > vcpu_runstate_change() gets called. What is your opinion about this?
Doing this in a central place is certainly the right approach, but adding an arch hook that needs to be called everywhere vcpu_runstate_change() wouldn't serve that purpose. Instead we'd need to replace all current vcpu_runstate_change() calls with calls to a new function calling both this and the to be added arch hook. But please wait for George's / Dario's feedback, because they seem to be even less convinced than me about your model of tying the updates to runstate changes. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
