On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 09.07.15 at 08:15, <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> > On 07/09/2015 01:52 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> >> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> >> @@ -514,6 +514,17 @@ static inline enum hvm_intblk
> nhvm_interrupt_blocked(struct vcpu *v)
> >> return hvm_funcs.nhvm_intr_blocked(v);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static inline int hvm_enable_msr_exit_interception(struct domain *d)
> >> +{
> >> + if ( hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
> >> + {
> >> + hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return -ENOSYS;
> >> +}
> >> +
>
> FWIW I agree that this would better return bool_t.
>
> Jan
>
Sure, that's fine by me.
Thanks,
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
