----- jbeul...@suse.com wrote: > >>> On 09.07.15 at 13:13, <elena.ufimts...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:10:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 08.07.15 at 19:27, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:33:59PM -0400, > elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote: > >> >> From: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimts...@oracle.com> > >> >> > >> > > >> > You usually say why you need this patch. Something as simple as: > >> > > >> > "In preperation for patch XXXX which will use it" is OK. > >> > >> Or, even better, add such macros when the first user appears. Iirc > >> I said so before... > >> > > Yes, I realized this late. Will move over in the next version if > needed. > > Don't you need to rebase on top of v6 of "dmar: device scope mem > leak fix" anyway? Or does the series not conflict with those changes?
You are right, it needs to be rebased. I can post later rebased on memory leak fix version, if you thin its a way to go. > > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
