>>> On 08.07.15 at 11:36, <chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -84,11 +85,21 @@ void *stack_base[NR_CPUS];
> static void smp_store_cpu_info(int id)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data + id;
> + unsigned int socket;
>
> *c = boot_cpu_data;
> if ( id != 0 )
> + {
> identify_cpu(c);
>
> + socket = cpu_to_socket(id);
> + if ( !socket_cpumask[socket] )
> + {
> + socket_cpumask[socket] = secondary_socket_cpumask;
> + secondary_socket_cpumask = NULL;
I don't think this will build with small enough NR_CPUS. Which
raises the question whether the use of cpumask_var_t is suitable
here in the first place.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
