Hi, At 17:38 +0000 on 07 Jul (1436290689), Sahita, Ravi wrote: > In order to make forward progress, do the other maintainers (Jan, > Andrew, Tim) agree with the patch direction that George has > suggested for this particular patch?
I'm no longer a maintainer for this code, but FWIW I think that this direction (adding a new argument to the internal APIs rather than adding new internal APIs) is correct. Because the sve bit must be _set_ to get the old/default behaviour, I think the p2m_pt implementation should always return sve = 1 on _get and possibly also assert sve != 0 on _set. Cheers, Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
