On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:06 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote: > #2. Don't expose "ignore" to user and just keep "host" as the default > > He told me he would discuss this with you, but sounds he didn't do this, > or I'm missing something here?
My question was regarding how xl rdm="type=none" differed from not saying anything (i.e. getting the default). You explained that this was useful to allow the default to be changed, which I agreed with. The question regarding the actually naming of the options at either the xl level or the libxl (which seems to be what Ian J's comments were on) are orthogonal to the question of whether there should be a way to explicitly ask for the default (as opposed to implicitly asking for it by omission of the option). Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
