>>> On 29.06.15 at 17:14, <don.sl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/29/15 10:03, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> I think this patch should do it for now:
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> index a4d7225..cc6130c 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int hvmemul_do_io(
>> else
>> {
>> rc = hvm_send_assist_req(s, &p);
>> - if ( rc != X86EMUL_RETRY )
>> + if ( rc != X86EMUL_RETRY || curr->domain->is_shutting_down )
>
> I do not know enough about "is_shutting_down" to agree. What is clear
> is that
> this test is not the same as "!vcpu_start_shutdown_deferral(curr)".
Together with Paul's reply the main question appears to have
remained un-answered: Does the patch suggested by Paul address
the problem you observed?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
