Jennifer Herbert writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/7] libxc: Use const pointer in
local_file_dump()"):
> By adding the const keyword, it is clearer to people and static analysis
> tools that no changes to the data are to be made.
Would it be wrong for a future patch to add a field to dump_args which
gets modified ? AFAICT the answer is `no'. So I don't understand why
it ought to be const.
Does your Coverity instance complain about every instance where a
struct exists which is not marked const but which could be ?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
