On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:51:57PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 15:23 +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 05:41:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 12:57 +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > > On a busy host, QEMU may take more than 10s to start. > > > > > > Please show your working here so that in 2 years when we want to know > > > why this value was chosen we don't have to go scrobbling around in the > > > ML archives looking for the data you gathered. > > > > OK. What about: > > I'm afraid none of that really explains why QEMU taking >10s is > reasonable/expected under the circumstances or why 60s is a good choice > now. > > Nor does it really answer Ian's question in > <21901.33163.547929.321...@mariner.uk.xensource.com> I think.
I only know what happen, not why it happen. How could I investigate why qemu is taking so long after an mmap() syscall? I guest at that time, it is copying the library into memory. -- Anthony PERARD _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
