On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 12:56 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 26/06/15 17:19, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h > > @@ -324,7 +324,6 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_domctl_max_vcpus_t); > > > > /* XEN_DOMCTL_scheduler_op */ > > /* Scheduler types. */ > > -#define XEN_SCHEDULER_SEDF 4 > > Please instead use: > > /* #define XEN_SCHEDULER_SEDF 4 (Removed) */ > > To help keep bits of the history, and reduce the likelyhood of > accidental reuse. > Ok, good point.
I just killed it as I did not see any trace of 0-3, which I suspect were the other previously existing schedulers, but, yes, I'll do as you suggest. Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel