On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 09:28 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > I would advocate a more dynamic idea of GUEST_MMIO_* so that the toolstack > > can allocate those with headroom. Perhaps stash it at the far far end > > of the guest accessible memory? But that would require an 64-bit capable > > OS which might not work for all use-cases (where you want a 32-bit OS). > > I'd be incline to define two areas, one under 4GB but limited in size > and the other above and to decide which to used based on $factors-tbd
+1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
