On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 12:08 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 12:58 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > stay. > > > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > > > > For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental, > > test failures are allowed, as it is for SEDF. > > > > Also, RTDS was introduced in Xen 4.5, so add the > > test only for the relevant brnaches. Similarly, > > SEDF is removed in Xen 4.6, so keep testing it in > > older branches. > > > > [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html > > osstest needs an S-o-b too I'm afraid. > Bah! How in h$%l did I manage to miss this!?! :-//
Would this work, or should I resend: Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> In any case, really sorry for that! :-( > Otherwise LGTM, Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > Thanks. I removed your Ack because, for gating it properly on the Xen version, I ended up restructuring it quite fundamentally. Thanks for looking at it again. Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
