On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 22:11 -0700, Meng Xu wrote: > 2015-06-25 5:44 GMT-07:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>: > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> > > --- > > Cc: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> > > Cc: Meng Xu <xumengpa...@gmail.com> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 6b1068e..e6616d2 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -282,6 +282,11 @@ F: tools/libxl/libxl_nonetbuffer.c > > F: tools/hotplug/Linux/remus-netbuf-setup > > F: tools/hotplug/Linux/block-drbd-probe > > > > +RTDS SCHEDULER > > +M: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> > > +S: Supported > > +F: xen/common/sched_rt.c > > I'm not sure if the following response is correct and proper, just in > case it is correct. :-) > It does not hurt, for sure. :-)
There are many interpretations of how this tags should be used, and 100% uniform consensus is hard to reach! :-P In any case, as the one doing (or making others do) the most of the work on this scheduler, my primary intent when Cc-ing you was to let you know that this is (may be?) happening. > Reviewed-and-Acked-by: Meng Xu <men...@cis.upenn.edu> > This at least tell me that you're aware and happy about it. Maintainers and committers will decide what to do with the tag (retain, ditch, adapt them, etc). Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
