On 24/06/15 18:57, Ed White wrote: > On 06/24/2015 07:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 22.06.15 at 20:56, <edmund.h.wh...@intel.com> wrote: >>> + case HVM_PARAM_ALTP2MHVM: >>> + if ( a.value > 1 ) >>> + rc = -EINVAL; >>> + if ( a.value && >>> + d->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_NESTEDHVM] ) >>> + rc = -EINVAL; >>> + break; >> As you added the new param to the change-once section of >> hvm_allow_set_param() - what is this code good for? > I don't understand. How does change-once invalidate this code?
I don't believe it does. This code (appears to) enforce the param being a boolean, and exclusive against HVM_PARAM_NESTEDHVM. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
