On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:14:03PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 17:08 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote: > > > The current code for allocating memory for PV guests batches the > > > hypercalls to allocate memory by allocating 1024*1024 extents of order 0 > > > at a time. To make this faster, first try allocating extents of order 9 > > > (2 MiB) before falling back to the order 0 allocating if the order 9 > > > allocation fails. > > > > > > On my test machine this reduced the time to start a 128 GiB PV guest by > > > about 60 seconds. > > >From 61s or from 600s? > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerw...@citrix.com> > > > > Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > Applied. There were some rejects due to "libxc: unify handling of vNUMA > layout" having gone in first, I think they were just contextual and they > seemed trivial to resolve, but please do (both) check. >
The patch looks good to me. Wei. > Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
