On Tue, Jun 16, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 19:58 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > > > In an ideal world, userspace tools like this should not really be tied > > > to NR_CPUS or MAX_CPUS. They should get max_cpu_id from Xen and > > > dynamically allocate a bitmap of sufficient size. > > > > The dumps are taken on one machine and get inspected on another, which > > may not even be a dom0. I like the idea with dynamically allocate the > > array size, based on a cmdline option. Once I find the time I will > > implement it. > > Perhaps we should split out "get xenalyze in tree" out from actual > improvements and development work? The former ought to be pretty easy to > achieve, no?
Yes, v6 of my series is ready to merge from my POV. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
