>>> On 10.06.15 at 10:56, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 14:53 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
>> 
>> To help on certain platforms to run.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> 
> To be effective (or at least consistent) on ARM, would we also want to
> change its efi_process_memory_map_bootinfo:
>         if ( desc_ptr->Type == EfiConventionalMemory
>              || desc_ptr->Type == EfiBootServicesCode
>              || desc_ptr->Type == EfiBootServicesData )
> to include a check on map_bs?

I'm not convinced, but I also don't know the history of why boot
services areas are being included here in the first place - Roy?
I.e. if the checks weren't there already, I'd agree that an addition
similar to the other ones would be needed here, but with the x86
side getting relaxed I don't see why you would want to tighten the
ARM side at the same time.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to