>>> On 10.06.15 at 10:56, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 14:53 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> >> >> To help on certain platforms to run. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > To be effective (or at least consistent) on ARM, would we also want to > change its efi_process_memory_map_bootinfo: > if ( desc_ptr->Type == EfiConventionalMemory > || desc_ptr->Type == EfiBootServicesCode > || desc_ptr->Type == EfiBootServicesData ) > to include a check on map_bs?
I'm not convinced, but I also don't know the history of why boot services areas are being included here in the first place - Roy? I.e. if the checks weren't there already, I'd agree that an addition similar to the other ones would be needed here, but with the x86 side getting relaxed I don't see why you would want to tighten the ARM side at the same time. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel