>>> On 08.06.15 at 14:29, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:20 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.06.15 at 15:31, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > No functional change
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
>> > CC: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org>
>> > CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>> > CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
>> > CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@citrix.com>
>> > CC: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org>
>> > ---
>> >  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c         |    2 +-
>> >  xen/arch/x86/mm.c              |    3 +--
>> >  xen/arch/x86/setup.c           |    2 +-
>> >  xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c       |    6 ++----
>> >  xen/include/asm-arm/device.h   |    2 +-
>> >  xen/include/asm-arm/platform.h |    2 +-
>> >  6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> 
>> Not having seen a ARM maintainer ack so far, I decided to commit
>> only the x86 parts.
> 
> It was only posted Friday afternoon.

Right, and this wasn't meant as a complaint or anything; I
simply wanted to get it off my plate, but didn't want to drop
bits silently. I suppose it would have been better to submit
these as independent x86 and ARM patches anyway...

> Anyway: Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>

And now also committed and pushed.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to